Avast! 8.0.1488 Final' title='Avast!Final' />Comparative testing of 21 popular firewalls to check the quality of protection from attacks, coming from inside the system.Avast Free Antivirus is perfect for people who send emails and surf popular websites.Firewall Outbound Attacks Protection Test July 2.Comparative testing of 2.In the test we checked the protection on 6.Just like an antivirus, firewall is one of the main components of computer safety system.However, compared with antiviruses, objective tests of firewall functioning are rarely done.We tried to close up this gap doing firewall outbound attack testing and testing personal IDSIPS for attack protection from vulnerable applications in 2.This year weve decided to expand the list of used methods and repeat the firewall test for outbound attack protection to see how the results have changed over the time that went by for popular products with this criteria.What is this test directed to or what functions does the firewall fulfill Based on the online standard definition RFC3.However, as malicious programs complexity and hacker attacks grow, the initial firewall tasks have been complemented by new functional modules.Its practically impossible to imagine the complete firewall system now without HIPS module monitoring system events, controlling system integrity, etc.The main task of a modern firewall is to block unauthorized outgoing and incoming network communications hereafter attacks.These include Outbound attacks on the firewall protected system initiated by hackers initiated by malicious code.Unauthorized outgoing network connections initiated by unreliable applications malicious code initiated by the applications whose network activity is evidently prohibited by the rules.Other than that, the products, that can be clearly considered personal firewalls in the classical 2.Instead of them we are using complex products for personal computer protection that always include a firewall component.A firewall test for external attack protection contains studying the attack quality protection from attacks coming from inside the system.The test was done in the following directions Checking process protection from finishing.Protection from standard outbound attacks.Testing protection from non standard leaks.Testing protection from non standard techniques of kernel mode penetration.Compared to the previous test there are quite a lot more attacks used now from 4.The operating system has also changed, and thats what the tested products have to be able to do.In the past test this was Windows XP, and in this test its Windows 7 x.Also, at the end of the year we are planning to have a similar test for Windows 7 x.OS.Test Methodology.Test Result and Awards.Introduction.Testing Firewalls for Outbound Attacks Protection.Comparing Quality of Protection with Standard and Maximum Settings.Final Test Results.Anti Malware.Partner Comments.Introduction.The testing included 2.Internet Security class, if the product line didnt include this product, specifically firewall was chosen by different vendors relevant at the moment of testing start May 2.Windows.Avast Internet Security 8.AVG Internet Security 2.Avira Internet Security 1.Bitdefender Internet Security 1.Comodo Internet Security 6.Dr.Web Security Space 8.Eset Smart Security 6.F Secure Internet Security 1.G DATA Internet Security 1.Jetico Personal Firewall 2.Kaspersky Internet Security 1.Mc.Afee Internet Security 1.Kingsoft Internet Security 2.Microsoft Security Essentials 4.Windows Firewall.Norton Internet Security 2.Online Armor Premium Firewall 6.Outpost Security Suite Pro 8.Panda Internet Security 1.PC Tools Internet Security 9.Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 6.Trust.Port Internet Security 2.Before starting the testing we have prepared the testing environment.For that purpose we have installed on a clean computer Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 x.The testing was performed at two setting stages the recommended by the vendor standard settings default settings and the maximum settings.In the first case we used the default settings recommended by the vendor and we followed all the recommended steps.In the second case we turned on andor put on highest mode the strictest settings all the settings that were turned off in the default mode, but that could impact the testing results.In other words, by setting up the highest settings we mean putting all available from the graphical user interface settings for all modules related to detecting malicious file or network activity to the strictest mode.The firewall testing was done based on the following outbound attacks broken down for ease to the following difficulty levels 1.Basic difficulty level 5.Elevated level of difficulty 8 possible attacks 1.A detailed description of all attack methods, used in the test, can be found in the testing methodology.Testing Firewalls for Outbound Attacks Protection.Testing firewalls was done on a set of 6.Excel report.To remind you, in accordance with the used award scheme, we gave 1 point if the attack was automatically blocked, the protection of the program tested was not disarmed.And, in the end, in case if the attack was completely successful, or if it partially disabled the protective shield, the points were not awarded.The maximum number of possible collected points in this test was 6.Table 1 2 and picture 1 2 show firewall testing results separately from the standard and maximum settings.For a better picture, the results for each firewall are broken down into two groups protection from basic difficulty level attacks and protection from more advanced level attacks.Table 1 Test Results of Firewalls on Standard Settings.Firewall.Basic Level Attacks max.Advanced Level Attacks max.Totally Points max.Points of the amount.Points of the amount.Comodo.Online Armor.Norton.Jetico.Outpost.Trend Micro. 42. 756.Kaspersky.Cisco Asa License Upgrade Failover Server there.Dr.Web. 42,5. 766.Trust.Port.G DATA4. Christmas Light Installation Riverside Ca Map here.Avast.Eset. 41. 736.Bitdefender.AVG4.Mc. Afee. 41.PC Tools.Avira. 40.Microsoft.F Secure.Panda.Kingsoft. 27.Picture 1 Test Results of Firewalls on Standard Settings Protection from outbound attacks on the recommended by the vendor settings leaves much to be desired.Only three firewalls were able to overcome the threshold of 8.Thats Comodo, Online Armor and Norton.Jetico products 7.Outpost 7.The results of the other firewalls turned out to be significantly worse.Compared to the results of the past testing all leaders confirmed their high results, there were only small movements within the leading group, for example, Outpost and Jetico switched their positions.The only surprise was Norton product that showed the results of 4.The results achieved are related to the fact that many vendors tweak the standard settings in such a way that the number of messages a user reacts to is lower.This is also confirmed by the test results firewalls asked users questions only in 5.This, however, impacts the protection level that stays silent in a situation when a malicious program will imitate doing very legitimate actions in the system.Its also important to note two trends.First, the percentage of preventing complex types of attacks overall is much worse than for the attacks at the basic complexity level.More than half of these attacks have been deflected only by four products Comodo, Online Armor, Norton and Jetico.Four more products have been included in the borderline group having deflected from 2.Outpost, Trend Micro, Kaspersky and Dr.Web.All other products shielded from not more than one complex attack.Secondly, the indicators of basic attack protection improved.If in the past test 1.Table 2 Test Results of Firewalls on Maximum Settings.Firewall.Basic Level Attacks max.Advanced Level Attacks max 8 pointsTotally Points max.Total Points of the amount.Points of amount.Comodo.Bitdefender.Online Armor.Kaspersky.Norton.PC Tools. 49,5.Outpost.Eset. 49.Dr.Web. 46,5. 837.Jetico.Trend Micro.Trust.Port.G DATA4.Avira.Avast.AVG4. 17. 36. 4,10.Mc.Afee.Microsoft.F Secure. Command And Conquer Tiberian Sun Windowed Mode . Panda.Kingsoft. 27.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |